Steady-state versus chemotherapy-based hematopoietic cell mobilization after anti-CD38-based induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: The incorporation of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in induction regimens of newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients has been established as a new standard. However, the optimal strategy of stem cell mobilization in this context is not yet clear. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: From May 2020 till September 2022, we retrospectively reviewed patients receiving anti-CD38 mAb-based induction therapy followed by stem cell mobilization either in a steady-state protocol (SSM) using 10 µg/kg granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for 5 days or in a chemotherapy-based protocol (CM) using 1-4 g/m2 cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. RESULTS: Overall, 85 patients (median age 61 years) were included in the analysis. In total, 90 mobilization attempts were performed, 42 with SSM and 48 with CM. There was no significant difference in the median concentration of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood (PB) prior to apheresis between SSM and CM (61/µL vs. 55.4/µL; p = .60). Cumulative CD34+ yields did not differ between the groups with median of 6.68 and 6.75 × 106 /kg body weight, respectively (p = .35). The target yield (≥4 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight) was reached in 88% (CM) and 86% (SSM), with a high proportion even after a single apheresis session (76% vs. 75%). Plerixafor was found to be more frequently used in SSM (52%) than in CM (23%; p < .01). A total of 83 patients underwent autologous transplantation and all were engrafted. CONCLUSIONS: Stem cell collection in patients undergoing anti-CD38-based induction therapy is feasible with either CM or SSM, although SSM more frequently requires plerixafor.

Spatial heterogeneity and differential treatment response of acute myeloid leukemia and relapsed/refractory extramedullary disease after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Although extramedullary manifestations (EMs) are frequent in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), they are often not detected during clinical workup and neither imaging- nor molecularly based diagnostic strategies are established to reveal their existence. Still, the detection of EM is essential for therapeutic decision-making, as EM present with aggressive and resistant disease and since mutational profiling might render patients within a different risk category, requiring personalized therapeutic strategies. Here, we report the case of an AML patient presenting with AML bone marrow (BM) infiltration and molecularly distinct EM at time of diagnosis followed by multiple EM relapses while undergoing several intensive chemotherapies including allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantations (alloHCTs). 18Fluorodesoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET)-imaging revealed EM sites in the mediastinum, duodenum, skin, and in retroperitoneal tissue, whereas recurrent BM biopsies showed continuous cytomorphologic and cytogenetic remission after alloHCT. To investigate the molecular background of the aggressive character of extramedullary disease and its differential treatment response, we performed amplicon-based next generation sequencing. An exon 4 (c.497_498insGA) frameshift RUNX1 mutation was exclusively found in all of the patient's EM sites, but not in the BM or in peripheral blood samples at time of EM reoccurrence. In addition, we detected an exon 13 (c.3306G>T) ASXL1 point mutation only in the retroperitoneal tumor tissue at the time of the fourth relapse. In contrast to the patient's intermediate-risk BM AML at diagnosis according to ELN2017, EM sites showed molecular adverse-risk features implicating intensified strategies like cellular therapies. Notably, disease relapse could only be detected by imaging throughout the course of disease. This case demonstrates both the necessity of continuous molecular profiling of EM to reveal differential molecular composition of EM and BM-derived AML, supposedly leading to divergent susceptibility to established therapies, as well as recurrent 18FDG-PET-imaging for detecting residual disease and assessment of treatment response in case of EM AML.

Prevalence and variation of CHIP in patients with aggressive lymphomas undergoing CD19-directed CAR T-cell treatment.

Inflammation plays an important role in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, especially in the pathophysiology of cytokine-release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Clonal hematopoiesis of indetermined potential (CHIP) has also been associated with chronic inflammation. The relevance of CHIP in the context of CAR T-cell treatment is widely unknown. We evaluated the prevalence of CHIP, using a targeted deep sequencing approach, in a cohort of patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma before and after CAR T-cell treatment. The aim was to define the prevalence and variation of CHIP over time and to assess the influence on clinical inflammation syndromes (CRS/ICANS), cytopenia, and outcome. Overall, 32 patients were included. CHIP was found in 11 of 32 patients (34%) before CAR T-cell therapy. CHIP progression was commonly detected in the later course. Patients with CHIP showed a comparable response rate to CAR T-cell treatment but had an improved overall survival (not reached vs 265 days, P = .003). No significant difference was observed in terms of the occurrence and severity of CRS/ICANS, therapeutic use of tocilizumab and glucocorticosteroids, paraclinical markers of inflammation (with the exception of ferritin), or dynamics of hematopoietic recovery. CHIP is commonly observed in patients undergoing CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy and is not associated with an inferior outcome.

Half-dose glucarpidase as efficient rescue for toxic methotrexate levels in patients with acute kidney injury.

PURPOSE: High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX)-associated acute kidney injury with delayed MTX clearance has been linked to an excess in MTX-induced toxicities. Glucarpidase is a recombinant enzyme that rapidly hydrolyzes MTX into non-toxic metabolites. The recommended dose of glucarpidase is 50 U/kg, which has never been formally established in a dose finding study in humans. Few case reports, mostly in children, suggest that lower doses of glucarpidase might be equally effective in lowering MTX levels. METHODS: Seven patients with toxic MTX plasma concentrations following HDMTX therapy were treated with half-dose glucarpidase (mean 25 U/kg, range 17-32 U/kg). MTX levels were measured immunologically as well as by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Toxicities were assessed according to National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. RESULTS: All patients experienced HDMTX-associated kidney injury (median increase in creatinine levels within 48 h after HDMTX initiation compared to baseline of 251%, range 80-455%) and showed toxic MTX plasma concentrations (range 3.1-182.4 µmol/L) before glucarpidase injection. The drug was administered 42-70 h after HDMTX initiation. Within one day after glucarpidase injection, MTX plasma concentrations decreased by ≥ 97.7% translating into levels of 0.02-2.03 µmol/L. MTX rebound was detected in plasma 42-73 h after glucarpidase initiation, but concentrations remained consistent at < 10 µmol/L. CONCLUSION: Half-dose glucarpidase seems to be effective in lowering MTX levels to concentrations manageable with continued intensified folinic acid rescue.